Timeline for Are questions about a narrow field off topic?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:40 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:50 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.islam.stackexchange.com/ with https://islam.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jan 9, 2017 at 10:31 | comment | added | qdinar | you should not punish questions for answers. i do not think it needed more clarity. are you sure? but it could have links to wikipedia etc, but in other hand users can just google the terms, and links can be added further by editions. i do not think that answers did not have anything about islam in them. i just forgot to say "as i know there is nothing contradicting it in quran", but i can add it later. this question is quite normal but maybe he should say that maybe there are some ideas of fate in islam that contradict that. | |
| Jan 7, 2017 at 4:17 | history | answered | goldPseudoMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |