I removed the text in question because, as was described in the edit summary, it was irrelevant.  The question was about [whether the prophet died naturally or if he was poisoned](http://islam.stackexchange.com/q/5945/22).  **The question had nothing to do with whether or not Aisha is a reliable narrator** which, as best I could tell, was the only point the removed text was trying to explain.  Were that the case, it could've easily been replaced with a single sentence stating "However, the Shi'a do not consider Aisha to be a reliable narrator, and as such treat these reports as questionable."

Answers are expected to be clear and focussed on the question asked; this not only helps the questioner himself but also all future users who are looking to find the answer.  As such, irrelevant information serves only to lengthen the post and **make the *actual answer* harder to distinguish**, which doesn't serve this community or the internet as a whole.

We are not a soapbox.  We are (trying to build) [a library of high-quality questions and answers](http://stackexchange.com/).

If someone (be it the questioner himself or a future user) wants to know *why* the Shi'a don't consider her to be a reliable narrator, that would be an excellent question for the site.  Because that's exactly what it is: **A completely different question**.

And if such a question were asked, explaining the situation in detail as was done would be entirely relevant.