I was looking through some questions and I found out that some users try to answer a specific question using evidences from their sect and at the same time include the opinions of other sects .
An example can be found here: https://islam.stackexchange.com/a/938/885
and there was another example too regarding Fatima(RA), which I had to waste my time trying to read the answer because he included some evidences from a different sect and then search for the evidences he mentioned and it turned out to be either taken out of its context or doesn't make any sense.
This doesn't mean it has zero advantages. Truth is that I learned a lot because the user has included some evidences from my sect which I wasn't aware of at all. However, the bad thing as I said earlier is that this user probably doesn't have enough knowledge about Y sect and he just copied and pasted from a webpage that belongs to his sect which also doesn't have enough knowledge hence there will be false information and things taken out of its context.
Another disadvantage, When someone does that, Other users who belong to Y sect will have to check behind him/her to see if he/she has made any mistake(probably will do) while they don't have to do that. They can use their efforts on something else in Islam.SE
So here is the question:
Should we kindly ask users to stick to the evidences from their sect when they answer a question ?
P.S: I am not trying to cause sectarianism here. But I found out some serious errors when qouting hadiths or fatwas and there is nothing worse than misleading Muslims or other users