Does heavy flagging of the post alone mean that it is not a valid answer? Of course respect of POV (Point Of View) is mandatory, but stating our POV should not be viewed as Attack: The fact that it was deleted first for plagiarism in spite of clear attribution on the first line itself and then it was undeleted after doing some fancy quoting. Then this answer was heavily viewed , no one gave the reasons like "this answer does not answer the question". And after some time it was AGAIN deleted for flimsy reason of "this answer does not answer the question".
A valid answer which was heavily viewed and spawned three other questions was deleted:
regarding flagging i came to know it is possible to flag a good answer of opposite sect by a closely knit nexus of preachers, resulting heavy flagging will cause it to change the perceptions of moderator causing him to delete the post. The net effect would be a small group of well knit partisan users can influence the perceptions of moderator and thus influence the content on this site to reflect the POV of this fringe group. How can this be controlled in such a site?
A partisan group can be found utilizing following features :
- Identify users who have high frequency of upvoting on each others posts
- Partisan Users who Flag the same posts have a higher proportion of such flags compared to non partisan groups
- Identify Question followed by an answer by the same user or between two high rep users