I recently wrote an answer on an important theological question. I presented a Sufi/Shia view while concluding with a jab at a serious flaw in Salafi/Wahhabi theology that has been the basis of inordinate secterian violence against Shias, Sufis and even non-conforming Sunnis. But within five minutes of posting my answer, goldPseudo suddenly jumped out and deleted my answer based on the charge that it was "rude" and "attacked" the Salafis. Here's may concluding remark that provoked his decision:
But sadly nowhere you find any recognition of such brilliant wisdom outsidee the Shia and Sufi world which is a pitty because the prevelant political biases and sterile theologies of Salafi literalists have kept the Muslim world in the dark about these most profound realities of their faith and have instead ravaged the Muslim world by a Wahhabi misguided obsession to chase out and cleanse all the "mushriks" from the face of the Earth!
First of all, calling Salafi theology "sterlie" was closely backed up by the previous two paragraphs in which I explained how the other alternative theological positions undermine the very basis of faith and religion by making them null and void.
As for my supposedly so outragous statement "Wahhabi/Salafi obsession to cleane the Shia and Sufi 'mushriks' from the Muslim world" it happens to be a matter of public record and an evident truth among all scholars of international relations and Mid-Eastern politics, because virtually all internationally-designated terrorist groups with a history of violence against Shias and Sufis belong to the Salafi and Wahhabi school. Yet, pointing out this obvious indisputable fact even implicitly and even within a scholarly context of the theological roots of this historical abomination by Salafis, is considered "rude" and "attack" by goldPseudo! The irony with associating the word "attack" with me here is quite interesting because we Shias have been the biggest group to suffer en masse as a result of "attacks" by Salafi armed groups for our supposed "shirk" and "mischivious influence" in the Muslim world!
The question is why an ideology that has almost become sysnomous with bigotry and terrorism in the international media must be protected from even mild criticism on a platform like SE? Is this is a Salafi website where you protect this ideology from frank criticism?