An hour ago, I had a chat room discussion with another user regarding a political issue, and yes! it was about the 9/11 incident and what we thought to be the real culprits of those terrorist attacks. Besides all the possible prejudices surrounding this issue and whatever anyone's particular position in regards with it, all along we conducted a civil, respectful albeit very serious and opinionated debate on the issue, prompted originally by the other fellow user, as evidenced by chat history that must be accessible to moderators.
But later on, when the discussion was already terminated with no inconvenience felt by any of us, the moderator goldPseudo came in deleting all the messages and reminding me in particular of the site policy about being "civil and respectful" as if I had violated those principles at all! He added:
Spouting off anti-anything rhetoric IS NOT ACCEPTABLE BEHAVIOUR HERE. You are free to hate whoever you want, be it zionists, or jews, or Americans, or whatever, but KEEP IT OFF OF THIS SITE. That includes the chat.
But that's again even a greater libel! If one reviews the whole exchange, he would instantly confirm that there was no indication whatsoever that I was "sprouting off" any hatred of any ethnic group or nationality! I was clearly not expressing hatred of neither Jews nor Americans nor even the Zionists in the broad sense of the term, or any other nationality, for that matter, except describing some Zionists involved in a myriad of various criminal actions as 'demonic' and it was particularly clear to the fellow user (who is by the way a Jewish himself and I think a former Israeli citizen) that I was referring to Zionist ELITE involved in serious violation of Palestinian rights and lives, and carrying out, as many critical researchers reasonably believe, the 9/11 false flag attacks. I was not directing it against any category of people but Zionists particularly involved in crimes and atrocities. Apart from that, the discussion was all along about reasoning and argument, sharing of respective evidences for our opinions and responding to the other side's objections to the points.
So I don't see how conducting a discussion involving evidences, reasoning, as a part of intellectual quest for knowledge and learning can be condemned in those derogatory terms and be punished by a two-week chat suspension!!
Please note, if there could've been any complaint by anyone, it should have come from the fellow Jewish user who was willingly following the discussion without ever raising any objection along the charges made by the mod. So what does the community think to have been the particular problem with the discussion to warrant such an aggressive measure by the moderator? Was his decision justified?