I don't know the original reason for deletion (I suspect there were comments involved that you are not showing us), but here are some reasons I think it should stay deleted:

1. It is not an answer to the question you posted it under. It does not build on the idea that was being presented there. It's relevant only in that it is your personal opinion about the state of the site.

2. Most of the things you say in that post you have said elsewhere on meta. You have both answers and dedicated questions already that cover much of the same content, sometimes word for word. Not every meta post about the state of the site is an appropriate venue for you to get on your soap-box all over again.

3. It has too many unrelated points for constructive feedback as an answer. Each of those would be better dealt with on meta as separate meta posts where the community can reply to and discuss the specific issue. This goes back to #1, but changing the topic in an answer means people are limited to comments to reply rather than being able to post full answers.

4. Your argument that another unrelated answer was allowed to stand therefore yours should to in completely invalid seeing as how the other unrelated answer was also asked to repost as a separate meta post. Just because somebody else made a similar mistake and it hasn't been resolved yet does not give you an excuse to make the same 'mistake' on purpose. That's a childish line of reasoning.

In the mean time I suggest you carefully read my recent post about attitudes on meta. That stuff applies to you personally even more than it does to the post I was replying under. You're tone here is not constructive! Stop making this a personality issue and stick to issues of content or specific actions. Saying things like "moderation [...] here [is] grossly biased" does nothing to identify or fix a problem. That just comes across like you are trying to pick a fight. How about A) listening to and trying to understand where other people are coming from when they disagree with you and B) identifying specific content issues and suggesting solutions rather than making ad-hominem attacks on moderators.

Lastly you need to adapt and learn to accept the decisions from the community even when you may still disagree. I see some of your past meta posts have raised specific issues. The answers you have gotten explain in detail why they disagree with you about either the nature of the problem or the solution, and voting clearly indicates community support for those positions. You need to adapt and learn from those incidents rather that keep bringing them up over and over and fighting the same issues.

I don't know the original reason for deletion (I suspect there were comments involved that you are not showing us), but here are some reasons I think it should stay deleted:

1. It is not an answer to the question you posted it under. It does not build on the idea that was being presented there. It's relevant only in that it is your personal opinion about the state of the site.

2. Most of the things you say in that post you have said elsewhere on meta. You have both answers and dedicated questions already that cover much of the same content, sometimes word for word. Not every meta post about the state of the site is an appropriate venue for you to get on your soap-box all over again.

3. It has too many unrelated points for constructive feedback as an answer. Each of those would be better dealt with on meta as separate meta posts where the community can reply to and discuss the specific issue. This goes back to #1, but changing the topic in an answer means people are limited to comments to reply rather than being able to post full answers.

4. Your argument that another unrelated answer was allowed to stand therefore yours should to in completely invalid seeing as how the other unrelated answer was also asked to repost as a separate meta post. Just because somebody else made a similar mistake and it hasn't been resolved yet does not give you an excuse to make the same 'mistake' on purpose. That's a childish line of reasoning.

In the mean time I suggest you carefully read my recent post about attitudes on meta. That stuff applies to you personally even more than it does to the post I was replying under. You're tone here is not constructive! Stop making this a personality issue and stick to issues of content or specific actions. Saying things like "moderation [...] here [is] grossly biased" does nothing to identify or fix a problem. That just comes across like you are trying to pick a fight. How about A) listening to and trying to understand where other people are coming from when they disagree with you and B) identifying specific content issues and suggesting solutions rather than making ad-hominem attacks on moderators.

Lastly you need to adapt and learn to accept the decisions from the community even when you may still disagree. I see some of your past meta posts have raised specific issues. The answers you have gotten explain in detail why they disagree with you about either the nature of the problem or the solution, and voting clearly indicates community support for those positions. You need to adapt and learn from those incidents rather that keep bringing them up over and over and fighting the same issues.

I don't know the original reason for deletion (I suspect there were comments involved that you are not showing us), but here are some reasons I think it should stay deleted:

1. It is not an answer to the question you posted it under. It does not build on the idea that was being presented there. It's relevant only in that it is your personal opinion about the state of the site.

2. Most of the things you say in that post you have said elsewhere on meta. You have both answers and dedicated questions already that cover much of the same content, sometimes word for word. Not every meta post about the state of the site is an appropriate venue for you to get on your soap-box all over again.

3. It has too many unrelated points for constructive feedback as an answer. Each of those would be better dealt with on meta as separate meta posts where the community can reply to and discuss the specific issue. This goes back to #1, but changing the topic in an answer means people are limited to comments to reply rather than being able to post full answers.

In the mean time I suggest you carefully read my recent post about attitudes on meta. That stuff applies to you personally even more than it does to the post I was replying under. You're tone here is not constructive! Stop making this a personality issue and stick to issues of content or specific actions. Saying things like "moderation [...] here [is] grossly biased" does nothing to identify or fix a problem. That just comes across like you are trying to pick a fight. How about A) listening to and trying to understand where other people are coming from when they disagree with you and B) identifying specific content issues and suggesting solutions rather than making ad-hominem attacks on moderators.

Lastly you need to adapt and learn to accept the decisions from the community even when you may still disagree. I see some of your past meta posts have raised specific issues. The answers you have gotten explain in detail why they disagree with you about either the nature of the problem or the solution, and voting clearly indicates community support for those positions. You need to adapt and learn from those incidents rather that keep bringing them up over and over and fighting the same issues.

I don't know the original reason for deletion (I suspect there were comments involved that you are not showing us), but here are some reasons I think it should stay deleted:

1. It is not an answer to the question you posted it under. It does not build on the idea that was being presented there. It's relevant only in that it is your personal opinion about the state of the site.

2. Most of the things you say in that post you have said elsewhere on meta. You have both answers and dedicated questions already that cover much of the same content, sometimes word for word. Not every meta post about the state of the site is an appropriate venue for you to get on your soap-box all over again.

3. It has too many unrelated points for constructive feedback as an answer. Each of those would be better dealt with on meta as separate meta posts where the community can reply to and discuss the specific issue. This goes back to #1, but changing the topic in an answer means people are limited to comments to reply rather than being able to post full answers.

4. Your argument that another unrelated answer was allowed to stand therefore yours should to in completely invalid seeing as how the other unrelated answer was also asked to repost as a separate meta post. Just because somebody else made a similar mistake and it hasn't been resolved yet does not give you an excuse to make the same 'mistake' on purpose. That's a childish line of reasoning.

In the mean time I suggest you carefully read my recent post about attitudes on meta. That stuff applies to you personally even more than it does to the post I was replying under. You're tone here is not constructive! Stop making this a personality issue and stick to issues of content or specific actions. Saying things like "moderation [...] here [is] grossly biased" does nothing to identify or fix a problem. That just comes across like you are trying to pick a fight. How about A) listening to and trying to understand where other people are coming from when they disagree with you and B) identifying specific content issues and suggesting solutions rather than making ad-hominem attacks on moderators.

Lastly you need to adapt and learn to accept the decisions from the community even when you may still disagree. I see some of your past meta posts have raised specific issues. The answers you have gotten explain in detail why they disagree with you about either the nature of the problem or the solution, and voting clearly indicates community support for those positions. You need to adapt and learn from those incidents rather that keep bringing them up over and over and fighting the same issues.